The decision on joint properties in Bengkulu High Religious Court Jurisdiction

Jayusman Jayusman

Abstract


Joint property disputes after divorce at the Religious Courts (PA) under the Bengkulu High Religious Court (PTA) jurisdiction are always equally settled by giving half for each ex-spouse, regardless of the domination in working to earn the properties. The decisions refer to the article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The decisions do not fulfill sense of justice regarding the ex-wife participating in earning the living. This library research would like to descriptively analyze the progressive law reviews of the decision related to joint properties with working wives set at some Religious Courts under the Bengkulu High Religious Court jurisdiction in 2016-2019 periods, in the context of reforming the Marriage Law in Indonesia. In drawing conclusions, the data are analyzed by applying progressive law theory. The study shows that Religious Courts’ decisions are not regulated in traditional Islamic law, but they are found in contemporary Islamic law by analogizing them as Shirkah with the division based on the agreement between the parties. In positive law perspective, the joint property division has been determined with each equally get half. In the meantime, from the progressive law perspective in the context of reforming the Indonesian Marriage Law, ex-wives participating in earning living should get a larger portion of joint properties than their ex-husbands, to fulfill the sense of justice. Their portions are decided amicably on the agreements of the parties


Keywords


Joint Properties; Progressive Law Theory; Bengkulu High Religious Court

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman. (1992). Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Akademi Pessindo.

As’ad, A. R. (2010). Gono-Gini dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Pengadilan Agama, (Oktober).

Atmasasmita, R. (2012). Teori Hukum Integratif: Rekontruksi terhadap Teori Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Progresif (cet-1). Yogyakarta: Gentaa Publishing.

Basyir, A. A. (2000). Hukum Perkawinan Islam. Yogyakarta: UII Pres.

Chairah, D. (2011). Hak Mut’ah, Hadanah, Dan Harta Bersama Bagi Perempuan Pasca Cerai Menurut Pandangan Nyai Di Pesantren Jawa Timur (UIN Surabaya).

Cholil, M. (2017). Complexities In Dealing With Gender Inequality: Muslim Women and Mosque-Based Social Services in East Java Indonesia, Journal Of Indonesian Islam, Volume 11, Number 02, December 2017

Decision number: 408/Pdt.G/2017/PA Bn.

Decision number: 779/Pdt.G/2017/PA Bn.

Decision number: 819/Pdt.G/2017/PA Bn.

Decision number: 87/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Bn.

Departemen Education and Culture Republic of Indonesia (2001). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Fahimah, I. (2015). Harta Gono Gini Dalam Perspektif Ushul Fikih. 1 St International Seminar on Islamic Studies. IAIN Bengkulu.

Firdawaty, L. (2016). Filosofi Pembagian Harta Bersama. Jurnal Asas, 8(1).

Hanapi, A. and Yuhermasyah, E (2020). Urgency of Marriage Registration for Women and Child Protectionin Gayo Lues District, Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum IslamVolume 4 No. 2. July-December 2020.

Ismuha. (1978). Pencaharian Bersama Suami Istri di Indonesia (cet. 2). Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.

Jafizham, T. (1977). Persentuhan Hukum di Indonesia dengan Hukum Perkawinan Islam,. Medan: Mustika.

Jamil, L. (1982). Aneka Hukum Perceraian Indoenesia. Jakarta: Ghia Indonesia.

Jumantoro, T. and Amin, S. M. (2005). Kamus Uṣūl Fiqh (First Ed). Jakarta: Penerbit Amzah.

Khallaf, A. al-W. (1972). Mashdar at-Tasyri’ al-Islami Fima La Nashsha Fih. Kuwait: Dar al-Qalam.

Kristiana, Y. (2006). Rekonstruksi Birokrasi Kejaksaan Dengan Pendekatan Hukum Progresif, Studi Penyelidikan, Penyidikan, dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PDIH Undip Semarang.

Lukito, R. (1998). Pergumulan antara Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat di Indonesia. Jakarta: INIS.

Mannan, A. (2006). Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mesraini. (2008). Hak-hak Perempuan Pasca Cerai di Asia Tenggara: Studi Perundang-undangan Perkawinan Indonesia dan Malaysia. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Mukhidin. (2014). Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterakan Rakyat. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(3).

Mulia, R. (2020). Marital Beslag Outside Divorce Lawsuit in the Maqashid Syari’ah Perspective, Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Volume 4 No. 2. July-December 2020, p. 411.

Rahardjo, S. (2008). Hukum Progresif : Hukum yang Membebaskan,. Jurnal Hukum Progresif Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum UNDIP.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia,. Yogyakarta: Gema Publishing.

Rahmawati, S. (2020). Mainstreaming of Gender Equality in Islamic Family Law: Opportunities and Challenges. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum IslamVolume 4 No. 2. July-December 2020, p.366.

Rifa’i, A. (2010). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakimdalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif (cet-1). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Ritonga, I. (2003). Hak-hak Wanita dalam Putusan-putusan Peradilan Agama DKI Jakarta 1990-1995. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Sayuti. (2013). Arah Kebijakan Pembentukan Hukum Kedepan (Pendekatan Teori Hukum Pembangunan, Teori Hukum Progresif, Dan Teori Hukum Integratif). JurnalAl-Risalah JISH, 13(2).

Suhandjati, S. and Kusuma, H. H. (2018). Reinterpretation Of Women’s Domestic Roles: Saleh Darat’s Thought on Strengthening Women’s Roles in Indonesia.Journal of Indonesian Islam Volume12,Number 02, December 2018, p.203.

Sugiswati, B. (2014). Konsepsi Harta Bersama Dari Perspektif Hukum Islam, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dan Hukum Adat. Jurnal Perspektif, XIX(3).

Tholib, S. (1974). Hukum Kekeluargaan Indonesia. Jakarta: UI Press.

Umar, A. al R. ibn M. ibn H. ibn. (n.d.). Bughyah al-Musytar syidin. tt: Dār Ihyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyah.

Utsman, S. (2010). Menuju Penegakan Hukum Responsif (cet. 2). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zahrah, M. A. (1958). Usūl al-Fiqh. tt: Dar al-Fikr al-‘Arabi.

Interview

Fatonah, U., Hakim PA Tais, 13 July 2020.

Pradinata, M., Hakim PA Manna, 06 July 2020.

Rifa’I, F.H., Hakim PA Kepahiang, 01 July 2020.

Rogaiyah, Hakim PA Kepahiang, 01 July 2020.

Yuzar, M., Hakim PA Kepahiang, 03 July 2020.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i1.99-118

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan by http://ijtihad.iainsalatiga.ac.id/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License