Examining Qanun in Aceh from a human rights perspective: status, substance and impact on vulnerable groups and minorities
Abstract
The Helsinki Agreement between the Aceh Freedom Movement (GAM) and the Indonesian Government aimed to end long-standing conflict and inequality in Aceh. It also legally empowered the Acehnese to govern their own province and protect their citizens from human rights abuses. Regrettably, the implementation of laws and policies in Aceh since the agreement, such as Qanun, has had an adverse effect on human rights, particularly for vulnerable groups and minorities. This paper analyses the need to align the substance of Qanun with international human rights norms and assesses the feasibility of implementing Qanun without violating human rights. The research method used is the qualitative method. The data collection technique mainly involves in-depth interviews with key informants, including academics, members of Aceh parliament, civil society organisations, representatives of religious organisations, the Aceh Sharia Court, the Acehnese government, and practitioners on women and children, as well as victims of human rights violations and literature reviews. This study has found that the implementation of Aceh Qanun has had negative consequences on the protection of human rights, particularly for vulnerable groups and minorities. In addition, it also affects vulnerable groups, Muslim and non-Muslim minorities who have been “forced to conform” with Aceh Qanun. The paper advocates for a harmonious balance between Qanun and human rights, which can be achieved through a more constructive dialogue between the two.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
acehkita.com (2015) Parade Ahlussunnah, Ini 12 Tuntutannya. ACEHKITA.COM. [Online]. Available from: https://acehkita.com/parade-ahlussunnah-ini-12-tuntutannya/ [Accessed: 27 March 2023].
Afsaruddin, A. (2017) What Sharia means: 5 questions answered. [Online]. 16 June 2017. The Conversation. Available from: http://theconversation.com/what-sharia-means-5-questions-answered-79325 [Accessed: 26 March 2023].
Aprilianda, N., Farikhah, M. & Krisna, L.A. (2022) Critical Review Selecting a Proper Law to Resolve Sexual Violence Against Children in Indonesia. Samarah. [Online] 6 (2), 954–974. Available from: doi:10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.9050.
BBC News Indonesia (2019) Ustaz Firanda ditolak di Aceh karena ‘lebih cenderung ke Wahabi’. BBC News Indonesia. [Online] 14 June. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-48617536 [Accessed: 27 March 2023].
Braithwaite, J., Braithwaite, V., Cookson, M. & Dunn, L. (2010) Anomie and Violence. [Online]. ANU Press. Available from: http://remote-lib.ui.ac.id:2063/stable/j.ctt24hf62 [Accessed: 12 April 2023].
Butt, S. (2018) Religious conservatism, Islamic criminal law and the judiciary in Indonesia: a tale of three courts. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. [Online] 50 (3), 402–434. Available from: doi:10.1080/07329113.2018.1532025.
Din, M. & Abubakar, A.Y. (2021) The Position of the Qanun Jinayat as a Forum for the Implementation of Sharia in Aceh in the Indonesian Constitution. Samarah. [Online] 5 (2), 689–708. Available from: doi:10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.10881.
Esmaeili, H. (2011) The Nature and Development of Law in Islam and the Rule of Law Challenge in the Middle East and the Muslim World. Connecticut Journal of International Law. 26 (2), 329–366.
Fadlia, F. & Ramadani, I. (2018) The Qanun Jinayat Discriminates Against Women (Victims of Rape) in Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights. [Online] 2 (2), 448–470. Available from: doi:10.19184/jseahr.v2i2.8358.
Feener, R. (2013) Social Engineering Through Shari’a: Islamic Law aAnd State-Directed Da’wa iIn Contemporary Aceh. Indonesia Law Review. [Online] 3 (3). Available from: doi:10.15742/ilrev.v3n3.42.
Halim, A. (2022) Non-Muslims in the Qanun Jinayat and the Choice of Law in Sharia Courts in Aceh. Human Rights Review. [Online] 23 (2), 265–288. Available from: doi:10.1007/s12142-021-00645-x.
International Crisis Group (2006) Islamic Law and Criminal Justice in Aceh. [Online]. Available from: https://icg-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/117-islamic-law-and-criminal-justice-in-aceh.pdf [Accessed: 27 March 2023].
Ismail, F.H., Sulong, J., Muzana, Z., Sabirin, et al. (2022) Vigilantism among the Community in Aceh Against the Accused of Violating the Shariah Criminal Law. Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial. [Online] 17 (2), 531–553. Available from: doi:10.19105/al-Ihkam.v17i2.6751.
Khanif, A. (2015) The paradox of religious (in)tolerance in Indonesia. [Online]. 16 October 2015. The Jakarta Post. Available from: https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/10/16/the-paradox-religious-intolerance-indonesia.html [Accessed: 27 March 2023].
Khanif, A. (2019) Women, Islam, aAnd Modern Family Construction iIn tThe Perspectives oOf Legal Pluralism iIn Indonesia. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah. [Online] 4 (2), 141–151. Available from: doi:10.22373/petita.v4i2.24.
Kingsbury, D. (2007) The Free Aceh Movement: Islam and democratisation. Journal of Contemporary Asia. [Online] 37 (2), 166–189. Available from: doi:10.1080/00472330701253759.
Maifizar, A. (2022) Wilayatul Hisbah’s (WH) strategy to enforce the law against Khalwat case in Ujung Karang West Aceh Regency. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan. [Online] 22 (1), 37–52. Available from: doi:10.18326/ijtihad.v22i1.37-52.
Muhibbuthabry, M., Jailani, J., Siregar, P.A. & Hutasoit, E.F. (2023) Qanun, religious education, religiosity and sexual activity among Muslim youth. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies. [Online] 79 (1). Available from: doi:10.4102/hts.v79i1.8020.
Nurrahmi, F. (2022) Mediated Representation of Sharia in Aceh: A Hybrid Approach to Media Frames. Religions. [Online] 13 (9). Available from: doi:10.3390/rel13090857.
Quraishi-Landes, A. (2016) Five myths about sharia. Washington Post. [Online] 24 June. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-sharia/2016/06/24/7e3efb7a-31ef-11e6-8758-d58e76e11b12_story.html [Accessed: 27 March 2023].
Saeed, A. (2006) Approaches to the Qur’an in Contemporary Indonesia. 1st edition. Oxford ; New York : London, Published in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies.
Salim, A. (2010) Dynamic Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Contested Legal Orders in Contemporary Aceh. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. [Online] 42 (61), 1–29. Available from: doi:10.1080/07329113.2010.10756640.
Salma, Fajri, A., Hidayat, T. & Safri, E. (2022) The Other Side of the History of the Formulation of Aceh Jinayat Qanun. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah. [Online] 22 (1), 83–110. Available from: doi:10.15408/ajis.v22i1.21000.
Siregar, H.B. (2008) Islamic Law in a National Legal System: A Study on the Implementation of Shari’ah in Aceh, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Law. [Online] 31–26. Available from: doi:10.1017/S2194607800000156.
Uddin, A.T. (2010) Religious Freedom Implications of Sharia Implementation in Aceh, Indonesia Islamic Law and Constitutional Liberty. University of St. Thomas Law Journal 603.
UN (2005) Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement | UN Peacemaker. [Online]. Available from: https://peacemaker.un.org/indonesia-memorandumaceh2005 [Accessed: 26 March 2023].
UN Secretariat (2006) Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations adopted by human rights treaty bodies :: note /: by the Secretariat. [Online] Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/576098 [Accessed: 27 March 2023].
Zainal Abidin Bagir, Adzkar Ahsinin, Afridal Dami, Roichatul Aswidah, et al. (2011) Analisis Qanun-Qanun Aceh Berbasis Hak Asasi Manusia. Indonesian Centre for Democracy and Human Rights. AA Sudirman (ed.). Jakarta, Indonesian Centre for Democracy and Human Rights.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v23i1.37-56
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan by http://ijtihad.iainsalatiga.ac.id/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License